Who Is the Real Creator?

Here is another set of questions I asked in the December 28, 2019 World Satsanga about the role of Event Space and different Creators. Since Event Space has been discussed in several previous posts, these questions and answers add to our understanding of who does what. I have entitled this post: Who is the real creator?

In “The Curators” you said that Event Space only provides the SPACE, but other entities actually create what is IN that space. I used to think that Event Space created or duplicated what was in that space, not us. BUT in September, you gave us an Event Space meditation to change our parallel self’s path by backtracking some branches or joining other branches to get back to our mainline life path.

Are the event space changes created by us (i.e. one parallel self from our soul aspect with a Desire — Intention — Thought — Action) OR are the changes actually made by the Curators/maintenance entities that are in charge of that level of Event Space function and optimization? Who is the true creator — our Source, us, Curators or Event Space?

What I’m being shown here is that, if you think about what’s been said in “The Curators” as being Event Space only creates the space, but other entities actually create what’s in that space, you have to think of it in a different way. You can reproduce a number of…let’s say you can build a building, copy one building. In this building, there’s lots of people working, living, enjoying themselves, etc. etc., but you create another building, which is a complete duplicate of that building. It’s still the building, but the people aren’t in there.

So what Event Space does is it creates the environment that needs to be created as a function of our decision processes. Okay, and that also creates different realities, of course. But when we get a collective event space being created that’s big enough to create a completely new environment, what we have is the environment that is copied over. So it copies everything, individuals as well. That’s the space. Then everything starts or functions without knowledge of the fact that it’s been duplicated.

We have another part of us, which has been created that is another one of us, which is working with a collective event space that is a function of our choices, or the other choice we could have had, or the other choices we could have had, that link in with those choices that others could have had, so to speak. And so then we start to create what is IN that event space.

So the Event Space, when it creates, it creates the space with that as it is. It’s a complete copy. Think of it as a carbon copy. But then what’s in that space is modified with or by those aspects that are duplicated or copied into that space, so to speak.

So in essence, everything is the creator. The Origin is creator. Source is creator. We’re creators. Curators are creators.

Sometimes we create event spaces that aren’t necessary. Sometimes we create event spaces that are, for want of a better word, in the wrong place. So that’s when the Curators come in. Sometimes they need to create an event space to join up event spaces, if they’ve come out of what would have been a natural alignment of event space.

And so it’s very complicated to understand, but everything has an effect on Event Space. Anything that is involved in a decision process or a choice process as a possibility of creating a new event space, either a very localized one, individualized one or a huge one, which can be multiversally sized from that perspective.

But getting back to the question, you in the book “The Curators” (page 99) said that Event Space only provides the space but other entities actually create what’s in that space. The creation of what’s in that space is and starts from the point at which that event space is created. So everything is duplicated and then it moves forwards. And that’s the creation of that which is in the event space.

The Event Space creates everything in one go. But it is devoid of creativity. It’s devoid of expression. It’s devoid of evolutionary progression. A second later, it starts to experience that, because the copied individuals, copied aspects move into it and start to work with it and start to experience it and change it again.

So I hope that’s answered that particular question. It’s a difficult one for people to understand. But people would think that, Oh, we create an event space, there’s nothing in it. But no, of course, there’s whole galaxies in there. There’s planets in there, if it’s a universally sized event space. But if it’s a planetary sized event space, then there’s a planet in there and everything that’s in there.

It’s not a raw space, it is a carbon copy of what was there, which has achieved nothing, experienced nothing and then a second later it starts to do that, because the other individuals, who are part of the decision process start to interact with that decision process and the others within it and the environment that they’re in, who also wanted to experience whatever their different decision process was.

What happens to the other parallels in that scenario? Are they dissolved then, if they are simultaneous or downstream from where we started backtracking? Isn’t that counterproductive for our Higher Self’s evolution through diversification via parallel selves?

No, everything continues. So when we get a carbon copy and we get a new event space created, the old event space is still there and can still duplicate. So everything continues. It’s only when the evolutionary dead end is achieved, the natural end of event, so to speak, that that event space then, like a reality, moves back into the mainstream or the next mainstream part of the event space, so to speak. So everything continues.

So if you think about it, you know, you’ve got one, which goes into two, which goes into four, which goes into eight, which goes into sixteen, which goes into thirty-two, as an example, you know, 64 and 128, blah, blah, blah, then you start to see that that which was being experienced by the first one, which went into two, is duplicated, which went into four, it’s quadrupled. Okay, so everything is happening, but each of those times at a duplication, you start to see a variation upon what is going to be experienced downstream or currently, so to speak, because of the decisions that are being made by the individual in that duplicated but that new event space.

Or is it more like “trimming” our event tree of life (like a rose bush), to make things more efficient, to get rid of the dying or dead branches to allow new growth to take place?

That happens, when we get to the end of event, which is in effect the end of the evolutionary opportunity, the evolutionary dead end, so to speak, or the experiential dead end, so to speak. So then things start to trim back. They start to nip back into the sort of next mainstream that was part of what allowed them to be created.

And so we go from the, if you like, if you were to get an oak tree and and you see the trunk going up, that’s the mainstream. And all the branches that are starting the fractalization and the different event spaces being created. Then if you turned it on its head, and it had all those branches…so let’s look at it in terms of the roots, for instance. All the roots then go back into the main trunk and that gives you an understanding of how all these different fractalizations or event spaces can all coalesce back together again into the main event stream or the main event space. Okay, a very good question.